"There is no doubt that one of the phenomena
most relevant of our time, this constituted
by the hegemonic role of human rights,
paradoxically from its transformation into a
predominant discorso has also been increased
its ambiguity and uncertainty "
Dubbie Non c'è ombra di più che a dei fenomeni
important of our time is constructed for the role
hegemonic human rights, ironically, by
become a predominant discourse is also
increased its ambiguity and uncertainty "1
Nowadays, when we talk about" human rights ", there are few individuals dubbitano existence of these, however, fundamentally change their view of the many points of view exist. First, there is no clear definition on human rights: in fact they end up as a smoky and ethereal concept that no one can define with certainty, clarity and concreteness, bringing everything to speak in the meantime, without distinction of natural rights, fundamental, subjective public, civil liberties, individual rights of people, however, the guarantee of respect for them turns out to be one of the most debated issues in the international context.
Heterogeneous found to be the thesis that place and maintain the foundations of the birth and evolution of "human rights". Currently, the search begins for one reason or reasoning, which, rather than being absolute and static, both cross and give them a meaning, a reason to exist. This blog tends to give them a solid base, a set of conditions and prerequisites for exercising them, as their crisis will prove to be not only a doctrinal level, but also in practice. However, for many governments, "human rights" will be only statements of principles of good and never the facts to which the company, worldwide, will benefit in the near future.
The current debates on "human rights" converge on issues related to their universality, the diversity of peoples, the diversity of beliefs and cultural relativity that we are experiencing worldwide as a result of the process globalization in which we are immersed. From all this it argues that these "rights" are the result of the culture that created them, so they primarily regarded as Eurocentric and less have a Christian connotation in their countries are also more precisely, belonging to the West, and would therefore be valid for a particular un'attinenza and specifically on that culture.
reduce everything to a crisis of the concept of "human rights", the story leads to rethink the fact that they became in time a necessity imposed by developed countries to make "a model to follow and be able to get that the condition of social development.
To support this premise, the thesis on democratization will be to ensure that only in this political regime, "human rights" can develop and fulfill their potential. Need a State able to perform its basic functions and a strong civil society, where we can reconcile in the same order, individual and collective rights. Unfortunately, the reality is very different: we are facing the crisis of nation-state with its many ramifications, connoting "human rights" in an unresolvable issue, very discussed and somewhat uncertain for many.
"First of all, explains Silvia Rojas, proves in practice the mechanisms required at the international level to supervise the completion by the states have a limited impact, and many of these states refuse to accept international intervention, referring to an unacceptable interference in internal affairs, thus leading to not let it exercise its right of self-determination and the principle of sovereignty, and this leaves only see a justification for continue policy with impunity. " 2
0 comments:
Post a Comment